Senator Demands Answers on Red Cross’ Finances

Prompted by an investigation by ProPublica and NPR, Sen. Charles Grassley asks the charity to explain how it has used donations from the public.

Posted on 01/10/15
By Justin Elliott & Jesse Eisinger | Via ProPublica
Senator Chuck Grassley has long pressed for tougher regulation of nonprofits and has a history with the Red Cross. (Photo by Gage Skidmore, Creative Commons License)
Senator Chuck Grassley has long pressed for tougher regulation of nonprofits and has a history with the Red Cross. (Photo by Gage Skidmore, Creative Commons License)

Citing an investigation by ProPublica and NPR, Sen. Charles Grassley is asking the American Red Cross to explain more clearly how it uses public donations, specifying how much money goes to services and how much to overhead.

 

“The public’s expectation for an important, well-known organization like the Red Cross is complete, accurate fundraising and spending information,” Grassley, R-Iowa, said in a statement. “In reaction to the news reports on this topic, I’m asking the Red Cross to elaborate on how it calculates the facts and figures given to the donating public.”

Americans typically look to the Red Cross whenever disaster strikes, giving generously. The iconic charity took in over $1 billion in donations in 2013.

 

In response to Grassley’s request, the Red Cross said it is setting up a briefing for the senator’s staff that will happen sometime later this month. “We welcome and look forward to the opportunity,” Red Cross spokeswoman Suzy DeFrancis said.

 

Grassley’s request was first reported by the Chronicle of Philanthropy.

 

At issue are statements made by Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern and echoed on the charity’s website and in other published materials that “91 cents of every dollar that’s donated goes to our services.”

 

But that oft-repeated figure is not borne out by the charity’s statements in annual reports and tax filings. These documents show that fundraising expenses alone have eaten up as much as 26 cents of every donated dollar in recent years.

 

After our inquiries last month, the Red Cross removed the statement from its website. The Red Cross said at the time that the claim was not “as clear as it could have been, and we are clarifying the language.”

 

Grassley has long pushed for tougher regulations of nonprofits and has a history with the Red Cross. In 2007, he pushed through legislation that overhauled the governance structure of the charity, which was chartered by Congress over a century ago.

 

Grassley isn’t the only one nosing into the Red Cross’ operations. The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, is looking into the charity’s troubled response to Superstorm Sandy, which hit New York and New Jersey in late 2012.

 

The GAO’s inquiry, which was first reported by the Chronicle of Philanthropy, began last February after a request from the staff of Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the ranking member of the Homeland Security Committee. Since then, the GAO and the Red Cross have been discussing the parameters of the study. The GAO says it plans to finalize its methodology “within the next couple of weeks” and then begin working on the inquiry itself.

 

The scope of the GAO’s probe is expected to encompass more institutional questions, including “What are the nature and extent of the oversight to which the organization is subject, and is it sufficient?”

 

 

Can you help us with our Red Cross reporting? Learn how to share a tip or email justin@propublica.org.

 

Justin Elliott

Justin Elliott

Justin Elliott is a ProPublica reporter covering politics and government accountability. Previously, he was a reporter at Salon.com and TPMmuckraker and news editor at Talking Points Memo. To securely send Justin documents or other files online, please visit our SecureDrop site.

Jesse Eisinger

Jesse Eisinger

Jesse Eisinger is a senior reporter at ProPublica, covering Wall Street and finance. He writes a regular column for The New York Times’s Dealbook section.

 

This article first appeared in ProPublica. Click here to go to the original.

 

 

Check Also

As Colorado River Dries, the U.S. Teeters on the Brink of Larger Water Crisis

The levels in the nation’s largest freshwater reservoir, Lake Mead, behind the Hoover Dam and a fulcrum of the Colorado River basin, have dropped to around 25% of capacity. The Bureau of Reclamation, which governs lakes Mead and Powell and water distribution for the southern end of the river, has issued an ultimatum: The seven states that draw from the Colorado must find ways to cut their consumption — by as much as 40% — or the federal government will do it for them.

A Supreme Court Scholar Explains the Impact of Dobbs

The Supreme Court’s decision to reverse 50 years of constitutional protection for the right to get an abortion is more than 200 pages long. Morgan Marietta, a political scientist at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell, and editor of the annual SCOTUS series at Palgrave Macmillan, studies the ideas and ideology of the court. We asked him to illuminate the thinking that lies behind the momentous decision.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.