India’s Scrapping of Article 370 in Occupied J&K Sparks Fears in Mizoram

View from India: New Delhi's's unilateral and illegal actions against occupied Jammu and Kashmir have triggered fears in the Christian-dominated northeastern Indian state of Mizoram, which is given special protection under provision of Article 371G of Indian constitution, that came into effect after the signing of Mizo peace accord in 1986.

Posted on 08/15/19
By Henry L Khojol | Via eastmojo.com
(Photo via Twitter)

The scrapping of special status granted to Jammu & Kashmir by modifying Article 370 of the Indian Constitution has triggered fear in the Christian-dominated Mizoram (a state in northeast India), which is given special protection under the provision of Article 371 G.

Article 371G, which came into effect after the signing of the historic Mizo peace accord in 1986, states that no act of President in respect of religious or social practices of the Mizos, their customary laws and procedures, administration of civil and criminal justice and ownership and transfer of land, shall apply to the Mizoram without the consent of the state legislature.

Some intellectuals and politicians were apprehensive that the Center’s move may increase the demand for Union territory by minority Chakmas, whose population, according to the native Mizos, was compounded by illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.

Recommended Reading: India: A fractured nation, divided polity

Lallianchhunga, assistant professor of the political science department in the Mizoram University, said that the abrogation of Article 370 can be replicated in Mizoram in two ways — firstly, the move will boost the morale of minority communities like the Chakmas in their demand for Union territory status.

Secondly, the right to purchase land and settlement in Mizoram may be opened to outsiders considering the consequence of the abrogation of Article 370.

He said that the Mizos will be ready to sacrifice their special privileges and status granted to them by Article 371G and the 1986 peace accord if the Center tries to scrap special status granted to Mizoram.

A senior politician, who chose to be anonymous, also expressed apprehension that if the Center scraps Article 371G, it may grant Union territory to minority Chakmas on compassionate ground as there is occasional communal issues between the Mizos and the Chakmas.

The fear of Chakmas demanding Union territory is also doing the rounds on social media following the Center’s move to abrogate Article 370.

Recommended reading: Mizoram traders urge locals not to let out property to ‘outsiders’

Meanwhile, former Mizoram chief minister and state Congress president Lal Thanhawla took to twitter sounding ‘red alert’ for the people of Northeast. He said that the Center’s move has become a threat to states like Mizoram, Nagaland and Arunchal Pradesh which are protected by the constitution.

“If article 35A and 370 are repealed, Article 371G, which safeguards the interests and existence of lesser tribals of Mizoram, is under severe threat,” the Congress leader said in his tweet.

Mizoram’s former chief minister Lal Thanhawla at a protest against the Citizenship Bill in Mizoram in February this year. (Photo courtesy Scroll.in)

The Center’s move to abrogate article 370 also came under severe attack from political parties.

Sounding high alert, state Congress said that the Inner Line Permit system, which protects the state from outsider under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873, can become under threat. The party also called collective effort from political parties, NGOs and churches to protect the state.

Zoram People’s Movement (ZPM) and the newly floated People’s Representation for Identity and Status of Mizoram (PRISM) also blamed the Center’s move, saying it violated the federal spirit of the consitution.

Meanwhile, home minister Amit Shah on Tuesday told Rajya Sabha that the center has no intention of scrapping special status granted to northeastern states under article 371 of the constitution.

The Center had on Monday revoked Article 370 and proposed that the Jammu and Kashmir be bifurcated into two Union territories — Jammu & Kashmir, and Ladakh.

This article first appeared in Eastmojo. Click here to go to the original

Check Also

Book Review: The Betrayal of India

The latest book on Mumbai attacks shows the inconsistencies in the evidence available and in the political treatment of the case by the Indian government and the media.

India’s Modi Pushing South Asia into War, Chaos

Modi and his hawkish followers did their best to divert the attention of the international community from the Kashmir crisis and isolate Pakistan. But they utterly failed.

Leave a Reply