How Much Would A US Government Shutdown Cost?

Posted on 09/24/13
By Alan Pyke | Via ThinkProgress

 

This article was published by the Center for American Progress Action.

(Photo by KAZ Vorpal)
(Photo by KAZ Vorpal)

With congressional conservatives poised to force a government shutdown at the end of the month over the three-year-old Affordable Care Act, economists are trying to tally up what shuttering the government would cost the country. Estimates vary widely, and the totals would depend on how long a shutdown would last, but any shutdown would undermine already slack economic growth.

Some firm numbers come from the last shutdown in the late 1990s, which cost the country 0.5 percentage points of gross domestic product (GDP) growth and more than $2 billion in unnecessary expenses. Those shutdowns lasted less than a month combined, and Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Director Doug Elmendorf said last week that while any shutdown would be costly, the damage would “scale up” the longer the government remains shut.

Moody’s Analytics founder Mark Zandi testified last Wednesday (September 18) that the timing of this budget fight means it would be more damaging than the Clinton-era shutdown. A three- to four-week shutdown “would do significant economic damage, reducing real GDP by 1.4 percentage points,” Zandi told the Joint Economic Committee last week, and a two-month shutdown “would likely precipitate another recession.”

With growth already far below the level needed for the economy to return to pre-recession employment levels, that’s a hit the country can ill afford.

Most of the costs of a shutdown are hard to tabulate because they involve damage to consumer, investor, and business confidence coming out of a shutdown, and lost time spent preparing for the worst in the weeks before a shutdown. The White House has already instructed agencies to begin preparing for the possibility that House leaders will force a shutdown rather than accept that they will not be able to defund Obamacare.

As Ezra Klein put it, “that means a lot of hours spent on nothing useful,” like preparing website notifications and new security measures and various other forms of logistical busywork necessary to be ready to shut down public services and facilities.

The brinkmanship doesn’t just waste government employees’ time, either, since companies that do business with the government don’t know whether or not they’ll be able or expected to fill contracts that come due in October. Just coming close to a shutdown harms business confidence, which in turn places a drag on economic growth that is tough to calculate with precision. Analysts blamed Monday’s slumping stock prices in part on the perception that the current fiscal fight could produce a shutdown.

 

Check Also

As Colorado River Dries, the U.S. Teeters on the Brink of Larger Water Crisis

The levels in the nation’s largest freshwater reservoir, Lake Mead, behind the Hoover Dam and a fulcrum of the Colorado River basin, have dropped to around 25% of capacity. The Bureau of Reclamation, which governs lakes Mead and Powell and water distribution for the southern end of the river, has issued an ultimatum: The seven states that draw from the Colorado must find ways to cut their consumption — by as much as 40% — or the federal government will do it for them.

A Supreme Court Scholar Explains the Impact of Dobbs

The Supreme Court’s decision to reverse 50 years of constitutional protection for the right to get an abortion is more than 200 pages long. Morgan Marietta, a political scientist at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell, and editor of the annual SCOTUS series at Palgrave Macmillan, studies the ideas and ideology of the court. We asked him to illuminate the thinking that lies behind the momentous decision.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.