Bihar Elections — Mind your Own Business, Pakistan

Why should Pakistani government and media draw pleasure out of the defeat of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BJP in Bihar elections? Is it really worth paying this much attention when Pakistanis have plenty of things to worry about at home? Pakistan needs to focus more on the causes that continue to taint its image abroad and are a source of internal discord as well.

Posted on 11/15/15
By Imtiaz Gul | Via The Express Tribune
(Photo by Narendra Modi, Creative Commons License)
Prime Minister Narendra Modi campaigned hard in Bihar ahead of elections. (Photo by Narendra Modi, Creative Commons License)

Bihar has spoken. A thumping rejection of the Modi doctrine. Should Pakistanis rejoice? Not really. Let the non- BJP Indians relish what seems to be a combination of Nitish Kumar’s good work, the enraged Muslim population and the socio-political revolt by lower caste Hindus. Let India’s democratic and secular fraternity deal with the rifts that have become pronounced within the ruling BJP following the defeat in Bihar and the demeaning remarks by the party General Secretary Kailash Vijayvargiya about Shatrughan Sinha. The sin that the actor-turned-politician had committed was to congratulate Nitish Kumar and Lalu Prasad Yadav.

 

“A dog runs after the car feeling it’s running because of him, but it’s not. The party doesn’t run because of one man” was how Vijayvargiya ran down Sinha in the aftermath of the BJP’s routing.

 

Elsewhere in London, Britons of Indian-origin are also preparing to protest against the BJP government’s policies  and have managed to project the words “Modi not welcome” onto the Parliament building on November 8,  days ahead of Modi’s arrival there on November 12. The Awaaz Network — the umbrella organization of these Indians — plans similar actions to protest “the unleashing of a violent authoritarian agenda that seeks to undermine India’s democratic and secular fabric”.

 

Many Pakistani TV channels lunged at this, out of sheer sadistic pleasure. They also went into an overdrive to applaud the electoral snub that the BJP received in Bihar. Why should our government and media draw pleasure out of this? Is it really worth paying this much attention when we have plenty of things to worry about at home? Pakistan needs to focus more on the causes that continue to taint its image abroad and are a source of internal discord as well.

 

Although the government claims improvement — also backed by statistics — yet most of Fata and parts of Balochistan remain embroiled in conflict. Much of this stems from Pakistan’s own skewed policies that for decades encouraged the flourishing of non-state actors in many of these ‘ungoverned spaces’, prompting outsiders to exploit these soft bellies.

 

Pakistan needs to look for antidotes to the recommendations that former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan G Parthasarathy, current National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval and 10 other security experts — most of them ex-officials of the Indian security establishment — had peddled at a meeting organized by the weekly India Today in October 2009. These experts recommended that: covert and overt actions should become essential ingredients of India’s policy; India must exploit fault lines within Pakistan; India must exploit its leverage in Balochistan and in some other parts of Pakistan; India must convey to Pakistan that if it commits a blatant anti-India act on the ground, a military act or otherwise, it will have to bear the repercussions; India must exploit the problems that Pakistan has in Afghanistan and Iran; India must not work for the stability of Pakistan and it should be allowed to disintegrate; the composite dialogue should be put into cold storage for now(http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/How+to+tackle+an+obstinate+Pakistan/1/68505.html,India Today, Nov 9, 2009).

 

Doval and others tabled these recommendations in all seriousness, one would assume, and these apparently resonated with the Indian establishment as well. Doval spoke more or less along similar lines on a few occasions until he was made the NSA in 2014.

 

Of course, there is no incriminating evidence regarding these recommendations coming into effect. But quite clearly, Fata, parts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan endured unusual violence between 2009 and early 2013. This violence receded somewhat after the American marines wrested the TTP militant Latifullah Mehsud from Afghan intelligence and handed him over to Pakistan in October 2013.

 

In short, Pakistan is currently facing the consequences of its own policies that sprang from a hackneyed political vision on Afghanistan and Kashmir. These policies gave India and others a justification for how they view us and the “terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan”.

 

There is no doubt that Pakistan has immensely suffered because of terrorism. Operation Zarb-e-Azb and the National Action Plan have helped in rehabilitating its image abroad. But the world is waiting to see more. Instead of indulging in a blame game with India or Afghanistan, Islamabad and Rawalpindi need to stay the current course and work with greater unity and vigor for internal stability rather than display sadistic joy over setbacks for India or Afghanistan.

 

The writer is the Executive Director of Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS). This article first appeared at The Express Tribune. Click here to go to the original.

Check Also

Abdullah Abdullah, the Harbinger of Peace in Afghanistan?

Abdullah Abdullah is more a ‘son of the soil’ than Ghani, who sooner or later will return to the US. It would also suit Afghanistan and the region if it had a rather independent government.

Assessing Kashmir on August 5

The Kashmiri population is paying the price for India’s single-handed action to “solve” the Kashmir conflict, which has created new turmoil in Indian Occupied Kashmir. There is no relief in sight for them in the short run.

Leave a Reply